Some differences between male and female university professors in America - Cory Clark with Modern Wisdom.
“71% of men reported that protecting free speech is more important than promoting an inclusive society; 59% of women said promoting an inclusive society is more important than protecting free speech.
56% of men said that colleges should not protect students from offensive ideas; 64% of women said that they should.
51% of men said colleges should not disinvite speakers if students threaten violent protest; 67% of women said they should.
58% of men opposed a confidential reporting system at colleges which students could use to report offensive comments; 54% of women supported it.
63% of men thought controversial news stories in student papers should not need administrators’ approval before publication; 51% of women thought they should.
65% of men believed that supporting the right to make an argument is not the same as endorsing it; 51% of women disagreed.
66–76% of men support intellectually foundational texts above diversity quotas on reading lists; 44–66% of women support diversity quotas above foundational texts.
Female academics report a greater willingness than their male counterparts to support dismissal campaigns against a colleague who has conducted research that reached a controversial conclusion.
58% of men said it is never acceptable to shout down speakers or to try to prevent them from delivering their remarks; 58% of women said it was sometimes or always acceptable.
Put simply; men are relatively more interested in advancing what is empirically correct, and women are relatively more interested in advancing what is morally desirable.” — Cory Clark.